POE234 Science, Technology, and Public Policy

2015

 
 
  1. “Anyone who believes in indefinite growth in anything physical, on a physically finite planet, is either mad or an economist.” Kenneth Boulding, economist, educator, peace activist, 1910-1993

Course description

  1. “It is widely understood that science and technological innovation are deeply linked to economic growth in a society and its corresponding ability to generate societal well-being. Thus, one could say that the public role of science is growing. This course will examine the public policy behind and the government's role in the science and technology innovation system and address questions that will explore the relationship between scientific research and political decision-making. The course will provide students with: a background on the science and technology policy environment; a multidisciplinary toolkit for thinking about science and technology policy and an understanding of the “social science” aspect of science and technology policy.” (RMC Undergraduate Calendar)

Where this course fits in degree programs

  1. This is a junior course in the field of public administration for political science students, and serving as an arts elective for students in other programs.  It is offered as an alternative to HIE289 for students in science and engineering programs.

Learning objectives

  1. Students taking the course will

  2. Understand links between technology, growth, and well-being

  3. Evaluate public policies behind government roles in science and technology in Canada

  4. Compare and evaluate technology innovation systems

  5. Practice application of a multidisciplinary toolkit for thinking about science and technology policy


  6. Engineering students taking the course will develop

  7. an ability to communicate complex engineering  concepts within the profession and with society at large (CEAB graduate attribute #7, communication skills)

  8. an ability to analyze social and environmental aspects of engineering activities, including an understanding of the interactions that engineering has with the economic, social, health, safety, legal and cultural aspects of society, uncertainty of prediction, and concepts of sustainable design and environmental stewardship (CEAB graduate attribute #9, impact of engineering on society and the environment)

  9. an ability to apply professional ethics to concepts of accountability and equity (CEAB graduate attribute #10, ethics and equity)

Commonality

  1. Engineering students will achieve the same objectives met by HIE289 or POE289


Textbook

Smardon, Bruce. 2014. Asleep at the Switch: The Political Economy of Federal Research and Development Policy since 1960. Kingston: McGill-Queens.


Other readings from the reference list will be accessible in electronic form online


Evaluation

40 percent in class participation and quizzes on readings

20 percent in class presentations

40 percent final exam


Pedagogy

The course adopts a problem-based learning approach, with each week focusing on a policy issue related to the learning objectives.


Participation opportunities and quizzes will be available online (Moodle) as well as in class.


  1.   Academic regulations 7.4 and 10.2 are in effect


  1. 7.4 For each course a student must complete term work and all assignments to the satisfaction of the department concerned.

  2. 10.2 The instructor may refuse a student permission to write a final examination in a course if the requirements with regard to course work have not been met.



Academic Misconduct
“Academic misconduct, including plagiarism, cheating, and other violations of academic ethics, is a serious academic infraction for which penalties may range from a recorded caution to expulsion from the College.  The RMCC Academic Regulations Section 23 defines plagiarism as: “Using the work of others and attempting to present it as original thought, prose or work. This includes failure to appropriately acknowledge a source, misrepresentation of cited work, and misuse of quotation marks or attribution.”  It also includes “the failure to acknowledge that work has been submitted for credit elsewhere.”  All students should consult the published statements on Academic Misconduct contained in the Royal Military College of Canada Undergraduate Calendar, Section 23.” 

“Assignments in this course are subject to submission for textual similarity review to the commercial plagiarism detection software under license to the Royal Military College of Canada. All assignments submitted will be retained as source documents in the reference database for the purpose of ascertaining the originality of current and future assignments submitted to the system.” Please note that this protects your work against being copied by others.




Outline of course material (13 weeks)

  1. 1.Introduction.  Course introduction and overview

  2. 2.Concepts. What are science, technology, knowledge, society, and policy?

  3. 3.Framework for analysis. What are the general structures of society and government, which affect science and technology policy and innovation?

  4. 4.Toolkit for policy analysis. What do different disciplines contribute to analysis of science and technology policy?

  5. 5.Checklist. How will you assess science and technology policy questions?

  6. 6.Growth.  When is growth good for society and how do we understand costs and benefits? How does growth relate to normative ideas about distribution?

  7. 7.Ingenuity.  What is ingenuity? What is an ingenuity gap, and when is it critical?

  8. 8.Public interest. What is the “public interest” in science and technology and how is it determined? (We focus on the impact of technology on security)

  9. 9.Committees, Courts, and Bureaucracies. How do governments make decisions about science and technology policy?

  10. 10.S&T Policy.  How has the Canadian government been engaged in science and technology policy since the Second World War?

  11. 11.Innovation systems. What is the Canadian experience of local, regional, and national innovation systems?

  12. 12.Equity. How does technological change affect fairness and equity in society?

  13. 13.Review. Practical policy briefs (exam preparation)


POE234 References

  1. This link will take you to a bibliography. References will be added and updated during the course, and new readings will be added to each week at least one week in advance.


Website

  1. This version of POE234 was developed by David Last without compensation as part of a normal teaching load to support delivery of an on-site course. It is neither the property nor the responsibility of RMC Division of Continuing Studies.  It is housed on a private web site paid for by Dr. Last.  Any requests for use of the course material must be referred to the authors or copyright holders.  The web site is for the use of students enrolled in the course or supervised by Dr. Last or other professors assigned to the course, and copyright material is made available to these students under “fair use” rules.

 

Course Syllabus

How does policy shape science? How does science become useful technology? Who pays, who benefits, who cleans up?